Empowering Change: Evaluating a Policy Implementation Workshop for State Medical Boards to Protect the Public

References

1. 1
   ↵

   Federation of State Medical Boards. US medical regulatory trends and actions. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.fsmb.org/u.s.-medical-regulatory-trends-and-actions/state-medical-board-data/

   Google Scholar
2. 2
   ↵

   Federation of State Medical Boards. Guidelines for the structure and function of a state medical and osteopathic board. Published April 2024. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/guidelines-for-structure-function-of-state-medical-and-osteopathic-board-2024.pdf.

   Google Scholar
3. 3
   ↵

   Harris JA, Byhoff E. Variations by state in physician disciplinary actions by US medical licensure boards. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2017;26(3):200-208. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004974

   Google Scholar
4. 4
   ↵

   Wolfe SM, Oshel RE. Report: Ranking of the rate of state medical boards’ serious disciplinary actions, 2019-2021. Public Citizen. Published August 16, 2023. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.citizen.org/article/report-ranking-of-the-rate-of-state-medical-boards-serious-disciplinary-actions-2019-2021/

   Google Scholar
5. 5
   ↵

   DuBois JM, Anderson EE, Chibnall JT, Mozersky J, Walsh HA. Serious ethical violations in medicine: A statistical and ethical analysis of 280 cases in the United States from 2008–2016. Am J of Bioeth. 2019;19(1):16-34. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1544305

   Google Scholar
6. 6
   ↵

   DuBois JM, Walsh HA, Chibnall JT, et al. Sexual violation of patients by physicians: A mixed-methods, exploratory analysis of 101 cases. Sexual Abuse. 2019;31(5):503-523. doi: 10.1177/1079063217712217

   Google Scholar
7. 7
   ↵

   DuBois JM, Anderson EE, Chibnall JT, et al. Preventing egregious ethical violations in medical practice: Evidence-informed recommendations from a multidisciplinary working group. J Med Regul. 2018;104(4):23-31. doi: 10.30770/2572-1852-104.4.23

   Google Scholar
8. 8
   ↵

   DuBois JM, Chibnall JT, Anderson EE, et al. Exploring unnecessary invasive procedures in the United States: A retrospective mixed-methods analysis of cases from 2008-2016. Patient Saf Surg. 2017;11(1). doi: 10.1186/s13037-017-0144-y

   Google Scholar
9. 9
   ↵

   DuBois JM, Chibnall JT, Anderson EE, Eggers M, Baldwin K, Vasher M. A mixed-method analysis of reports on 100 cases of improper prescribing of controlled substances. J Drug Issues. 2016;46(4):457-472. doi: 10.1177/0022042616661836

   Google Scholar
10. 10
    ↵

    McIntosh T, Pendo E, Walsh H, Baldwin K, DuBois JM. Protecting patients from egregious wrongdoing by physicians: Consensus recommendations from state medical board members and staff. J Med Regul. 2021;107(3):5-18. doi: 10.30770/2572-1852-107.3.5

    Google Scholar
11. 11
    ↵

    Federation of State Medical Boards. Report of the Special Committee on Professional Conduct and Ethics. Published 2000. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.fsmb.org/siteassets/advocacy/policies/report-of-the-special-committee-on-professional-conduct-and-ethics.pdf

    Google Scholar
12. 12
    ↵

    Teegardin C, Robbins D, Ernsthausen J, Hart A. License to betray. The Atlanta Journal Constitution. Published July 5, 2016. Accessed February 25, 2026. http://doctors.ajc.com/doctors_sex_abuse/.

    Google Scholar
13. 13
    ↵

    Teegardin C. Georgia medical board easy on opioid violators. The Atlanta Journal Constitution. Published December 7, 2017. Accessed February 25, 2026. https://www.myajc.com/news/public-affairs/georgia-lets-doctors-keep-practicing-despite-opioid-violations/VIWYD0oplqfzb8BgDF4v1J

    Google Scholar
14. 14
    ↵

    Sisk BA, Mozersky J, Antes AL, DuBois JM. The “ought-is” problem: An implementation science framework for translating ethical norms into practice. Am J Journal of Bioethic. 2020;20(4):62-70. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1730483

    Google Scholar
15. 15
    ↵

    Locke EA, Latham GP. Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist. 2002;57(9):705-717. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.9.705.

    Google Scholar
16. 16
    ↵

    Parks-Stamm, EJ, & Gollwitzer, PM. (2009). Goal implementation: The benefits and costs of if-then planning. In GB Moskowitz, & H. Grant (Eds.), The psychology of goals (pp. 362-391). Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar
17. 17
    ↵

    Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R. Bridging the intention–behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy, and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology & Health. 2005;20(2):143-160. doi: 10.1080/08870440512331317670

    Google Scholar
18. 18
    ↵

    Lorig K, Laurent DD, Plant K, Krishnan E, Ritter PL. The components of action planning and their associations with behavior and health outcomes. Chronic Illn. 2014;10(1):50-59. doi: 10.1177/1742395313495572

    Google Scholar
19. 19
    ↵

    Gollwitzer PM. Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist. 1999;54(7):493-503. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.54.7.493

    Google Scholar
20. 20
    ↵

    Gollwitzer PM, Sheeran P. Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‐analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 2006;38(1):69-119. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

    Google Scholar
21. 21
    ↵

    McIntosh T, Pendo E, Walsh HA, et al. What can state medical boards do to effectively address serious ethical violations? J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(4):941-953. doi: 10.1017/jme.2024.6

    Google Scholar
22. 22
    ↵

    Pendo E, McIntosh T, Walsh HA, Baldwin K, DuBois JM. Protecting patients from physicians who inflict harm: New legal resources for state medical boards. Saint Louis University Journal of Health Law and Policy. 2021;15(1):7-54. https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1277&context=jhlp

    Google Scholar
23. 23
    ↵

    Federation of State Medical Boards. Report and recommendations of the FSMB workgroup on physician sexual misconduct. J Med Regul. 2020;106(2):17-36. doi: 10.30770/2572-1852-106.2.17

    Google Scholar
24. 24
    ↵

    McIntosh T, Oetterer H, DuBois JM. Learning from leading peers: An interview study with seven SMBs that recently implemented policies to protect patients. J Med Regul. (2025) 111 (2): 18–30. doi: 10.30770/2572-1852-111.2.18

    Google Scholar
25. 25
    ↵

    Solomon ED, Mozersky J, Goodman M, et al. A randomized implementation trial to increase adoption of evidence-informed consent practices. J Clin Transl Sci. 2022;7(1):e28. doi: 10.1017/cts.2022.520

    Google Scholar
26. 26
    ↵

    Shearer E, Magnus D. Using implementation science to enact specific ethical norms: The case of code status policy. Am J Bioeth. 2020;20(4):6-7. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2020.1735874

    Google Scholar
27. 27
    ↵

    O’Toole Jr LJ, Slade CP, Brewer GA, Gase LN. Barriers, and facilitators to implementing primary stroke center policy in the United States: Results from 4 case study states. Am J Public Health. 2011;101(3):561-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.197954

    Google Scholar
28. 28
    ↵

    De Hert S, de Paula–Garcia WN. Implementation of guidelines in clinical practice; barriers and strategies. Curr Opin Anesthesiol. 2024;37(2):155-62. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001344

    Google Scholar
29. 29
    ↵

    Ashcraft LE, Quinn DA, Brownson RC. Strategies for effective dissemination of research to United States policymakers: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020;15:1-17. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01046-3

    Google Scholar
30. 30
    ↵

    Wang Z, Bero L, Grundy Q. Understanding professional stakeholders’ active resistance to guideline implementation: the case of Canadian breast screening guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2021;269:113586. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113586

    Google Scholar
31. 31
    ↵

    Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1991;50(2):179-211. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

    Google Scholar
32. 32
    ↵

    Fishbein MA, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975.

    Google Scholar